Package: python2.3-xml Version: 0.8.4-1 Severity: normal
If I visit file:///usr/share/doc/python2.3-xml/xmlproc/xmlproc.html and click on "formal BSD-ish license", it goes to file:///usr/share/doc/python2.3-xml/xmlproc/license.html, which doesn't exist. It should have gone to file:///usr/share/doc/python2.3-xml/xmlproc/xmlproc-license.html. I don't know what priority to give this. The intent is clear but taken literally the license for the code is unspecified, which is surely a violation of some Debian policy or other. -- System Information: Debian Release: 3.1 APT prefers testing APT policy: (1500, 'testing') Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 2.4.26-treo Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C Versions of packages python2.3-xml depends on: ii libc6 2.3.2.ds1-20 GNU C Library: Shared libraries an ii python2.3 2.3.5-1 An interactive high-level object-o -- no debconf information -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
