Hey Scott,

since nitrokey-app has been kickout of testing today, I want to ask
about the update? Do you need some help I could offer?

Best,
Jan

Am 21.08.20 um 00:01 schrieb Scott Kitterman:
> I will take care of it.  The removal isn't scheduled for almost a month, so 
> there is plenty of time.
> 
> Scott K
> 
> On Thursday, August 20, 2020 12:28:17 PM EDT Jan Luca Naumann wrote:
>> Hey Scott,
>>
>> could you update the package? Since this is marked as RC bug,
>> libnitrokey and all depending packages are kicked out of testing.
>>
>> Best,
>> Jan
>>
>> On Mon, 03 Aug 2020 13:54:57 +0000 Scott Kitterman
>>
>> <deb...@kitterman.com> wrote:
>>> This is probably a result of a new GCC version.  C++ symbols can be
>>> painful to manage.  This will be trivial to update the next time I update
>>> the package.
>>>
>>> Scott K
>>>
>>> On August 3, 2020 9:15:16 AM UTC, Szczepan Zalega | Nitrokey 
> <szcze...@nitrokey.com> wrote:
>>>> On 8/3/20 10:41 AM, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
>>>>> (optional=templinst|arch=!amd64 !arm64 !x32)
>>>>> (optional=templinst)
>>>>
>>>> Hi!
>>>>
>>>> As far as I see the problem comes from the listing format difference,
>>>> not the actual symbol change.
>>>>
>>>> E.g.:
>>>> ```
>>>> - (optional=templinst|arch=!amd64 !arm64
>>>> !x32)_ZN8nitrokey5proto17ResponseDissectorILNS0_9CommandIDE65ERKNS0_14Dev
>>>> iceResponseILS2_65ENS0_12EmptyPayloadEEEE24status_translate_commandB5cxx1
>>>> 1Ei@Base 3.5
>>>> +
>>>> (optional=templinst)_ZN8nitrokey5proto17ResponseDissectorILNS0_9CommandID
>>>> E65ERKNS0_14DeviceResponseILS2_65ENS0_12EmptyPayloadEEEE24status_translat
>>>> e_commandB5cxx11Ei@Base 3.5
>>>> ```
> 

Reply via email to