On 10/9/20 8:27 AM, r...@rene-engelhard.de wrote: > Better as (first) alternative though so using the "GUI version" still will > work.
absolutely, thanks. > But why are you filing this against libre office and not unoconv? It's > unoconv doing the stuff, not libreoffice? sorry; I generally fill bugs against the name of their source package (out of lazyness I guess). Regards, Daniel
