Hi On 2020-10-16 14:16:47 -0500, Brett Gilio wrote: > Sebastian Ramacher <sramac...@debian.org> writes: > > > autopkgtest for cudf/0.9-1: amd64: Pass, arm64: Pass, armhf: Regression ♻ > > (reference ♻), i386: Pass > > autopkgtest for dose3/5.0.1-15: amd64: Pass, arm64: Pass, armhf: Test in > > progress, i386: Pass > > autopkgtest for mcl/1:14-137+ds-9: amd64: Pass, arm64: Pass, armhf: > > Regression ♻ (reference ♻), i386: Pass > > autopkgtest for morbig/0.10.4-4: amd64: Pass, arm64: Pass, armhf: > > Regression ♻ (reference ♻), i386: Not a regression > > autopkgtest for morsmall/0.3.0-3: amd64: Pass, arm64: Pass, armhf: > > Regression ♻ (reference ♻), i386: Pass > > autopkgtest for ocaml-visitors/20200210-2: armhf: Regression ♻ (reference ♻) > > autopkgtest for ppx-deriving-yojson/3.5.3-1: amd64: Pass, arm64: Pass, > > armhf: Regression ♻ (reference ♻), i386: Pass > > autopkgtest for sks/1.1.6+git20200620.9e9d504-1: amd64: Pass, arm64: Pass, > > armhf: Regression ♻ (reference ♻), i386: Pass > > autopkgtest for why3/1.3.3-1: amd64: Pass, arm64: Pass, armhf: Test in > > progress, i386: Pass > > > > Hi, new OCaml team member. Are these regressions introduced on the > 4.11.x switch? Thanks!
Except for sks, they were fixed by rerunning them with the correct binNMUs. sks, however, looks like a real issue introduced by the switch to 4.11.1 Cheers -- Sebastian Ramacher
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature