> -----Original Message----- > From: Boyuan Yang <by...@debian.org> > Sent: Tuesday, November 3, 2020 23:45 > To: Limonciello, Mario; 973...@bugs.debian.org > Subject: Re: Bug#973715: fwupd-amd64-signed: Uninstallable; not binNMU- > friendly > > > [EXTERNAL EMAIL] > > Hi, > > 在 2020-11-03星期二的 22:21 +0000，Limonciello, Mario写道： > > > -----Original Message----- > > > From: Boyuan Yang <by...@debian.org> > > > Sent: Tuesday, November 3, 2020 13:09 > > > To: sub...@bugs.debian.org > > > Subject: Bug#973715: fwupd-amd64-signed: Uninstallable; not binNMU- > > > friendly > > > > > > Package: fwupd-amd64-signed > > > Severity: grave > > > Version: 1.4.6+2 > > > X-Debbugs-CC: 93...@debian.org mario.limoncie...@dell.com > > > > > > Dear EFI Team, > > > > > > Package fwupd-amd64-signed currently cannot be installed on Debian > > > Unstable/Sid. It depends on fwupd (= 1.4.6-2) while Sid only has > > > fwupd > > > (= 1.4.6-2+b1). > > > > I'm sorry can you show me where this +b1 build is? > > > > I don't see it mentioned in https://tracker.debian.org/pkg/fwupd > > It is shown at https://buildd.debian.org/status/package.php?p=fwupd . > If you actually install a Debian Sid system, you can also find the > package with this version string. > > > > > It seems obvious that such dependency relationship made > > > fwupd/fwupd- > > > amd64-signed not binNMU-friendly. Please consider setting a version > > > range to allow binNMU-ed package to satisfy the dependency > > > relationship. > > Please consider reading https://wiki.debian.org/binNMU and see how can > things be improved. > > Thanks, > Boyuan Yang
I think the problem here is that the EFI binary sign process just didn't run. @Steve McIntyre is that supposed to be automatic now? Or still manual?
