On Wed, Nov 11, 2020 at 11:09:32AM +0100, Maarten L. Hekkelman wrote: > Hi Juhani, > > Bug #974074 is in fact a bug in MRS. However, the bug report does contain a > useful observation, the usage of the various override_dh_auto_configure > rules in libzeep is incorrect and no shared library is created. > > Now the question is, is a shared library really required?
Yes, definitely. > If so I will have > to go back to the drawing board and redesign the makefiles in the upstream > project to create proper shared libraries, including a version numbering > scheme. Usually a library package should feature both: Shared is mandatory and static recommended. The shared library should have a proper SOVERSION. Kind regards Andreas. > regards, -maarten > > > Op 11-11-2020 om 09:13 schreef Juhani Numminen: > > On Tue, 10 Nov 2020 23:03:57 +0100 Sebastian Ramacher > > <sramac...@debian.org> wrote: > > > Hi Marten > > > > > > On 2020-11-10 07:42:45 +0100, Maarten L. Hekkelman wrote: > > > ... > > > > Sorry, long story. To make it short. > > > > - Keep mrc, no problem there > > > > - Upgrade libzeep to version 5 > > > > > > > Thanks for the detailed explanation. The first two steps are almost done > > > The current versions of mrc and libzeep should be able to migrate soon > > > as their RC bugs have been fixed. > > > ... > > Right, but one RC bug is not fixed yet: libzeep packages are missing the > > shared library altogether; the .so files are not there. > > > > For that we have bug #974074, and see gregor's message for suggested fix. > > It seems he is confident in the first diff of that mail, while the latter > > diff > > is more speculative. > > https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=974074#19 > > > > > > Regards, > > Juhani > > > > > > -- > Maarten L. Hekkelman > Cataloniƫstraat 3 > 6663NJ Lent > > http://www.hekkelman.com/ > +31 24 348 0192 > > -- http://fam-tille.de