Hi Vagrant, thanks for the prompt fix! I consider to be sufficiently fixed given that this line wasn't needed before and hence seems to be optional anyways.
Vagrant Cascadian wrote: > There are a few other issues related to the lack of proper support for > init.d scripts as well, and it would be nice to fix issues to support > other init systems... any help would be appreciated! Sorry, since I have no idea for what a package manager needs an init script (or its own user, except maybe for privilege separation during downloads), I have no idea what actually an init script should do here. Looking at /usr/lib/sysusers.d/guix-daemon.conf it seems as if guix needs some kind of daemon?!? That's unexpected. I'm also not convinced by guix' concepts (and containing a daemon just added one more argument against guix) and just installed it to maybe occasionally understand more if its something useful for me or not. So I currently neither consider myself a regular user nor a potential future contributor besides reporting obvious packaging-related bugs like this one. [opensysusers] > I did ask zigo about the status of opensysusers on IRC, and got the > impression that it might be orphaned or removed from the archive, I see. > so did not pursue further, though does not sound like it would be > difficult to add support. Ok for me. > Alternate to having a working sysusers.d implementation, it could be > documented in README.Debian to create the users and groups manually. Would be fine for me. I though wonder if a "Recommends: systemd" or "Suggests: systemd" would make sense here. Regards, Axel -- ,''`. | Axel Beckert <a...@debian.org>, https://people.debian.org/~abe/ : :' : | Debian Developer, ftp.ch.debian.org Admin `. `' | 4096R: 2517 B724 C5F6 CA99 5329 6E61 2FF9 CD59 6126 16B5 `- | 1024D: F067 EA27 26B9 C3FC 1486 202E C09E 1D89 9593 0EDE