On Fri, Dec 4, 2020 at 1:15 PM Bill Allombert <ballo...@debian.org> wrote:
> What about devtodo ? > > Reading your summary, it seems that the todo.txt virtual package > is well specified, but the todo one is not. > > Do you envision to have packages depending on todo and then use the > todo binary ? > No. This is a means to allow topydo and todotxt-cli to use "todo" without crowding devtodo. I believe this meets the definition of a virtual package in the Policy. I do see the desirability for packages to be able to Depend on todo.txt, with an expectation of the command line format beneath (e.g. support for a todo.txt schema).
