* Torsten Landschoff ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > On Tue, Feb 22, 2005 at 04:07:30PM -0500, Stephen Frost wrote: > > After some discussion w/ Steve Langasek regarding the issues which exist > > w/ OpenLDAP 2.1 he had this suggestion: > > What are the major issues BTW!? I think 2.1.30 is mostly unusable > because of the data loss issues and broken TLS support.
Yeah, data loss, broken TLS, and security problems too that have all
been fixed or don't exist in the 2.2 series.
> > OpenLDAP 2.2 produces (2.2.x):
> > slapd
> > ldap-utils
> > libldap-evil-lemurs (used only by slapd && ldap-utils)
> > libslapd2-dev (never been *really* supported, and still not)
> >
> > OpenLDAP 2 produces (2.1.x):
> > libldap2
> > libldap2-dev (using libldap2)
>
> Good idea. I'd rather call it libldap2.2 and omit the -dev package for
> now to stop people from using it for their packages.
Sure, I don't care what you call the libraries really. I expect we'll
need to deal w/ upstream regarding their SONAME'ing and whatnot
post-sarge anyway, so I'd expect it to change.
> That's actually how it could work. I'll have new packages up tomorrow.
Awesome. Many thanks.
Stephen
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
