On Mon, Dec 7, 2020 at 1:00 PM Paul Gevers <elb...@debian.org> wrote: > On 07-12-2020 08:11, László Böszörményi (GCS) wrote: > > Yeah, it's a bit confusing why someone tagged this as affecting > > experimental. > > That's because you fixed this bug in experimental. So the BTS apparently > that's part of where the bug is relevant. The version in experimental is > marked as fixed, so everything's fine. Ah, got where the misunderstanding is between us. I talk about #975848 [1] while you are not.
> > I could _not_ confirm that the FTBFS happens there. > > Neither did the person that set that tag. Otherwise he would have also > used "reopen" too. Take a look at the top right version plot in the BTS. As noted, there are two GCC FTBFS bugs and the latter set as affecting experimental for no known reason. Regards, Laszlo/GCS [1] https://bugs.debian.org/975848
