Ryan Armstrong <zer...@zerker.ca> writes: > I just did a bit of digging, since I previously had a 2.11 BSD VM set up > in SIMH (fun!). It looks like the version of mille in that release was > indeed from about the 1985/1986 time frame, and the copyright headers > were not yet added. So that makes much more sense then removing them. > > I guess the question becomes, would they still require a change in > copyright status, or is the previous status correct? > > Also, should a credit for Ken Arnold be added?
I'm about half way through updating the code by copying the mille code into xmille, along with copyrights. This has the advantage of fixing a number of crashes on 64- bit architectures. When I finish, I'll create a new upstream version, at which point we can package that for debian and resolve the copyright and license issues. -- -keith
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
