Hi Jonas, Am Sonntag, den 20.12.2020, 14:10 +0100 schrieb Jonas Smedegaard: > This package has been superseded by fonts-urw-base35, which contains > the > same fonts but a newer release and using policy-compliant package > name.
indeed, I have prepared fonts-urw-base35 to take over both gsfonts and gsfonts-x11 since the very beginning: https://salsa.debian.org/fonts-team/fonts-urw-base35/-/blob/master/debian/control#L15 However, I have hesitated to do so. The reason is that we have the urwcyr fork in the gsfonts package, and last time I checked not all cyrillic glyphs that this fork added were also available in the urw releases. > Setting severity to serious, as this package is not fit for release. Why do you think the package is not fit for release? Because it did not have a maintainer upload for the last 10 years? It is static font data, after all? Or because it does not follow a naming convention that isn't even Debian policy? Cheers, - Fabian
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
