On Sun, 20 Dec 2020 11:50:42 +0200
Adrian Bunk <b...@debian.org> wrote:
> this is a regression in 1.2.1+dfsg-2 that is currently in both 
> buster-security (which was done on top of 1.2.1+dfsg-2 that
> introduced the regression, not on top of 1.2.1+dfsg-1 in buster) and
> in unstable/testing (which currently misses the CVE fixes).
> 
> It would be good if you could make an upload to unstable with this
> bug fixed on top of 1.2.1+dfsg-2+deb10u1, and then backport that
> change to buster.
> 
> Please coordinate with the security team whether this would warrant a 
> regression update to the DSA or should be done through the next point 
> release.

Hi, Team.

Does anyone mind against uploading fix to stable-proposed-update?
The fix is here:
https://salsa.debian.org/debian/minidlna/-/commits/buster-security/
Or should it go to buster-security?


Also uploaded to unstable as 1.2.1+dfsg-3

-- 
Best regards,
 Alexander Gerasiov

 Contacts:
 e-mail: a...@gerasiov.net  WWW: https://gerasiov.net  TG/Skype: gerasiov
 PGP fingerprint: 04B5 9D90 DF7C C2AB CD49  BAEA CA87 E9E8 2AAC 33F1

Reply via email to