Hi, On 2019-12-17 16:48:21 +0100, Bálint Réczey wrote: > I asked upstream if they just want to silence the notice, but they > don't want to: > https://github.com/linux-pam/linux-pam/pull/158 > > It leaves us with disabling it using configuration files. IMO the > proposed patch of removing nullok_secure is safe and the desired > solution. > However it is up to the maintainers, Steve, or Sam, to accept the > patch unless someone NMUs it. > I don't plan NMU-ing it myself, but since the general NMU rules apply > any DD can NMU it via DELAYED/10.
Any news? -- Vincent Lefèvre <vinc...@vinc17.net> - Web: <https://www.vinc17.net/> 100% accessible validated (X)HTML - Blog: <https://www.vinc17.net/blog/> Work: CR INRIA - computer arithmetic / AriC project (LIP, ENS-Lyon)
