On Sun, Apr 16, 2006 at 08:40:26PM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote: > On Sun, Apr 16, 2006 at 07:53:00PM -0700, Marc Singer wrote: > > On Sun, Apr 16, 2006 at 10:22:29PM -0400, Patricio Rojo wrote: > > > Package: buici-clock > > > Version: 0.4.5+b1 > > > Severity: grave > > > Justification: renders package unusable > > > > After last upgrade of the X system, buici-clock got removed. When trying > > > to reinstall it, I get the following message... > > > > The following packages have unmet dependencies: > > > buici-clock: Depends: libice6 but it is not going to be installed > > > Depends: libsm6 but it is not going to be installed > > > Depends: libx11-6 but it is not going to be installed > > > Depends: libxext6 but it is not going to be installed > > > ACK. I'll take a look. > > The problem is that buici-clock installs to /usr/X11R6/bin, which is going > away. This was always a bug in buici-clock, according to policy 11.8.7: > > Packages using the X Window System should not be configured to install > files under the `/usr/X11R6/' directory unless they use `imake'. The > `/usr/X11R6/' directory hierarchy should be regarded as deprecated for > all packages except the X Window System itself, and those which use > the `imake' program it provides, in which case the packages may > transition out of the `/usr/X11R6/' directory at the maintainer's > discretion.[1] > > But now it's a release-critical bug. See > <http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2006/04/msg00010.html>. > > It looks like this is a one-line fix to debian/rules. > > Thanks,
NP. I incorrectly thought I'd done this already. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
