On Thursday, 7 January 2021 9:10:14 PM AEDT Paul Wise wrote:
> When the drivedb.h gets automatically updated by update-smart-drivedb
> then the next upgrade of smartmontools will get a conffile prompt that
> will have to be manually resolved by a user who won't necessarily be
> able to do that, so I don't think that this would be a good idea.
> 
> I also don't think any users need the ability to add their own entries
> to drivedb.h, generally people will only pull the latest version in.
> 
> So I think my original suggestion is the better option.

Makes sense, thanks. I'll probably implement unconditional replacement
of "drivedb.h" at first, then think of version detection, if time allows.


> Apart from the $Id version, it might be possible to rely on the dates
> returned by the VCS web servers, I haven't checked this though.

I probably won't have time to look into that in the foreseeable future...

-- 
Kind regards,
 Dmitry Smirnov
 GPG key : 4096R/52B6BBD953968D1B

---

If you are out to describe the truth, leave elegance to the tailor.
    -- Albert Einstein

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.

Reply via email to