Hi,
> Since then, he continued develop under original project name Valentina, > whereas Seamly2D virtually stalled with no substantial code changes , > only superficial changes to build infrastructure, locales, and icons. well, compared to valentina it seems to have way more pull requests and is at least very responsive to requests. Looking on valentina it seems to be a one-man-show - more or less. > I recommend that Debian does not carry Seamly3D, and encourage helping > out with maintaining Valentina instead. Would have been nice to know about that after I've opened the RFP bug - to be hones I haven't even been able to find valentina with apt, maybe I've searched for the wrong words. > If you disagree, then I just wish you the best of luck with Seamly3D. > I admit the severity is bloated - feel free to lower as you see fit. I think keeping one of them in Debian is the better option, but for now I'm not sure whats the best option. I'd be very happy to co-maintain one. Never planned to put seamly2d into bullseye, so don't worry about severities. Any idea why there is a fork at all? (feel free to reply in private...) Cheers, Bernd -- Bernd Zeimetz Debian GNU/Linux Developer http://bzed.de http://www.debian.org GPG Fingerprint: ECA1 E3F2 8E11 2432 D485 DD95 EB36 171A 6FF9 435F
