On Fri, 8 Jan 2021 19:17:45 +0100 Francesco Poli wrote: [...] > Please take into account that I am experiencing the same exact issue > with claws-mail (which is known to be a fork of sylpheed, although the > two code bases have probably diverged significantly in so much time...) > and with libreoffice-writer (which really surprised me, as I thought it > was not even using the same spell checker library: libhunspell-1.7-0, > rather than libaspell15...).
Hello again, it seems that sylpheed and libreoffice-writer (can) use the same dictionary: hunspell-it (for Italian spell checking). I thought that this dictionary was usable only with libhunspell, but I was probably wrong. And it seems that the regression I reported was introduced by the upgrade of hunspell-it (which, on my system, happened on January, the 6th): [UPGRADE] hunspell-it:amd64 1:7.0.1-1 -> 1:7.1.0~rc1-1 The [bug] has been reported against package hunspell-it and subsequently fixed in version 1:7.1.0~rc2-1 of hunspell-it. [bug]: <https://bugs.debian.org/979439> I've just upgraded to hunspell-it/1:7.1.0~rc2-2 (currently in Debian unstable) and I can confirm that it fixes the regression: [UPGRADE] hunspell-it:amd64 1:7.1.0~rc1-1 -> 1:7.1.0~rc2-2 Feel free to reassign this bug report to package hunspell-it and to forcemerge it with the already closed bug report #979439. Sorry for reporting a regression that was not actually caused by package sylpheed! And thanks for your time and patience. -- http://www.inventati.org/frx/ There's not a second to spare! To the laboratory! ..................................................... Francesco Poli . GnuPG key fpr == CA01 1147 9CD2 EFDF FB82 3925 3E1C 27E1 1F69 BFFE
pgpkQAZ5qlWB9.pgp
Description: PGP signature
