On Tue, Jan 26, 2021 at 06:30:25PM +0100, Matthias Klose wrote: > On 1/26/21 5:55 PM, Holger Levsen wrote: > > On Tue, Jan 26, 2021 at 04:36:13PM +0100, Matthias Klose wrote: > >>>> :) note however that "#975016: OpenJDK 15 support state for Bullseye" is > >>>> still > >>> ping, has there been any progress on this? > >> chatting with Moritz from the security team, we found four options: > >> 1) Ship a snapshot of OpenJDK 17 in bullseye. [...] > > > > I'm confused, the bug title is about OpenJDK 15?! > > > > So besides OpenJDK 17, what about 15 and 16? > > see https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=975016#10
thanks
> the bug title is about one, and only one more, additional openjdk-N version,
> which is supposed to be an openjdk LTS version again: 17.
so if 17 were shipped, 15 would not be shipped?!? (and 16 neither)
--
cheers,
Holger
⢀⣴⠾⠻⢶⣦⠀
⣾⠁⢠⠒⠀⣿⡁ holger@(debian|reproducible-builds|layer-acht).org
⢿⡄⠘⠷⠚⠋⠀ PGP fingerprint: B8BF 5413 7B09 D35C F026 FE9D 091A B856 069A AA1C
⠈⠳⣄
There are no jobs on a dead planet. (Also many other things but people mostly
seem to care about jobs.)
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
