On 2/18/21 10:58 PM, Michael Banck wrote: > tags 983040 +wontfix > merge 983040 964773 > thanks > > On Thu, Feb 18, 2021 at 03:35:21PM +0200, Andrius Merkys wrote: >> On 2021-02-18 15:27, Michael Banck wrote: >>> On Thu, Feb 18, 2021 at 02:48:49PM +0900, Francois Berenger wrote: >>>> --- >>>> python3 >>>> import rdkit >>>> from rdkit import Chem >>>> rdkit.Chem.INCHI_AVAILABLE >>>> # False >>>> --- >>>> >>>> It would be nice if INCHI support is enabled >>>> when building rdkit for Debian. >>>> >>>> If you point me to the bugtracker where I should report >>>> this (not found after 10min of searching...), I might report it there. >> >> This has already been reported as [#964773]. In short, rdkit cannot be >> built with INCHI support in Debian due to DFSG reasons (please see the >> original bug report for explanation). >> >> [#964773] https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=964773 > > Thanks Andrius for the pointer. By the way, I've looked at the INCHI > licenes again, and clause 3 allows to use the INCHI code under the GPL, > was it considered to just go that route in Debian or is there some other > loophole I don't see? > > Maybe RDKit could be changed in some way to build against both INCHI > versions, but if that is possible at all, it sounds like a major > project. > > Francois, what might help here is opening an issue with RDKit's GitHub > issue tracker and asking them about supporting both versions.
Ok, I opened this one: https://github.com/rdkit/rdkit/issues/3826