On Fri, Feb 12, 2021 at 12:59:53PM +0100, Bastian Germann wrote: > On Wed, 10 Feb 2021 15:53:24 +0100 Gunnar Hjalmarsson <gunna...@ubuntu.com> > wrote: > > Hi! > > > > It appears to me that this removal was done prematurely. The removal > > prevents quite a few packages from trying to build on kfreebsd-amd64 and > > kfreebsd-i386. This is one example which I stumbled upon: > > > > https://buildd.debian.org/status/package.php?p=marisa&suite=experimental > > > > Tracking the reason for those "BD-Uninstallable" occurrences leads me - > > over perl, gettext and emacs - to this: > > > > https://buildd.debian.org/status/package.php?p=git > > > > Not sure I make the correct analysis, though. It's rather messy. > > > > -- > > Gunnar Hjalmarsson > > https://launchpad.net/~gunnarhj > > > > It seems like a bigger problem on kfreebsd: git does not build because the > old gettext cannot be installed without the libcroco. Also, a newer gettext > does not build (via emacs) without git-man at some specific version. Would > it make sense to reintroduce libcroco for unstable only and losen the > versioned git -> git-man dependency to resolve this?
There are test-depends too, so this breaks some autopkgtests. The one I just found was: https://salsa.debian.org/js-team/node-normalize.css/-/blob/master/debian/tests/control -- Iain Lane [ i...@orangesquash.org.uk ] Debian Developer [ la...@debian.org ] Ubuntu Developer [ la...@ubuntu.com ]
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
