On Wed, Apr 19, 2006 at 04:03:26AM -0700, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote:
> This is an automatic notification regarding your Bug report
> #359136: tclx8.3: patches generated file,
> which was filed against the tclx8.3 package.
> 
> It has been closed by one of the developers, namely
> Massimo Dal Zotto <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>.
> 
> Their explanation is attached below.  If this explanation is
> unsatisfactory and you have not received a better one in a separate
> message then please contact the developer, by replying to this email.
> 
> Debian bug tracking system administrator
> (administrator, Debian Bugs database)
> 

> Date: Wed, 19 Apr 2006 12:44:11 +0200
> From: Massimo Dal Zotto <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: Bug#359136: source: patches generated file
> In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6+20040907i
> X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
>       (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
> X-Spam-Level: 
> X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER 
>       autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
> 
> On Sun, Mar 26, 2006 at 02:28:41PM -0500, Justin Pryzby wrote:
> > Package: tclx8.3
> > Version: 8.3.5-6
> > Severity: important
> > 
> > #356320 was apparently worked around by patching the generated
> > configure file, which is mentioned as a bad practice in policy 4.3.
> > 
> 
> The configure file is not generated during debian build but distributed
> with the upstream sources, so policy 4.3 doesn't apply in this case.
Policy 4.3 doesn't say that it applies only when the Makefile (or
friends) are regenerated:

     If you need to edit a `Makefile' where GNU-style `configure' scripts
     are used, you should edit the `.in' files rather than editing the
     `Makefile' directly.  This allows the user to reconfigure the package
     if necessary.  You should _not_ configure the package and edit the
     generated `Makefile'!  This makes it impossible for someone else to
     later reconfigure the package without losing the changes you made.

The rationale is that, although Debian is a "binary distribution", it is
common for people to retrieve the sourcecode and recompile locally, or
to use for their own projects.


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to