Hi Helmut, First: wow, great investigative work!
Helmut Grohne (2021-03-05): > So I have a longer patch fixing 1-6 attached. Please consider applying > it. I guess this is post-bullseye material though. Of course you can > give some feedback pre-bullseye to move this forward. I would be happy to review a patch series. Indeed, this can totally happen without being blocked by the freeze. Here's what I'd like to review: - atomic patches (ideally as a MR on Salsa, but if that's too inconvenient for you, I can live with the email workflow; it's just less motivating, so you should expect longer delays): all changes bundled in one single diff is too painful for me to review and to selectively apply - based on the current 3.x (debian/experimental) codebase: both the upstream code and the packaging have changed quite a bit since 2.13.x and I'd rather not have to forward-port these changes Fair enough? Additionally, I'm considering dropping the Perl extension in the 3.x packaging: it's not used by anything in Debian anymore and I seriously doubt there's any relevant, non-obsolete, 3rd-party code that uses it. I understand this move would simplify your work a fair bit, and for me it's another reason in favor of dropping libapparmor-perl. So you could ignore the Perl bits for now :) Cheers!
