Hi Paul,
On Thu, Apr 08, 2021 at 10:02:02PM +0200, Paul Gevers wrote:
> On 08-04-2021 21:52, Andreas Tille wrote:
> > Ahhh, I assumed that basic autopkgtest-pkg-r is consider superficial.
>
> That's an interesting point. Should they (they're not)? Maybe with R
> packages autopkgtest-pkg-r may or may not be very extensive? If that's
> true, than it's currently basically up to individual packages to mark
> themselves superficial when using autopkgtest-pkg-r.
We are working on it makeing them non-superficial. Its the case for
r-bioc-* currently[1] and the plan is to do this for all R packages.
However, this is for the next release. Marking those packages
superficial that do not come with a proper test can be done as well,
but not in the current freeze period.
Kind regards
Andreas.
[1]
https://salsa.debian.org/r-pkg-team/dh-r/-/blob/master/scripts/pkg-r-autopkgtest#L15
--
http://fam-tille.de
