On Thu, Apr 20, 2006 at 03:01:19PM +0200, Marco d'Itri wrote: > On Apr 20, Wouter Verhelst <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > will be closed with (at most) a pointer to that file; but I don't see > > why you shoul _forbid_ people to use it after being duly warned. > Because *it does not work*.
So? IMAO, the same applies to all of udev, but that doesn't mean I'll make nbd-client (which uses /dev entries) conflict with udev. > I am not sure how I could express this concept in other ways. I don't see why you would need to. Moreover, having ifrename installed doesn't necessarily mean you're also actually using it; so conflicting with it is not the right thing to do. -- Fun will now commence -- Seven Of Nine, "Ashes to Ashes", stardate 53679.4 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]