Hi Andrej, On Fri, Apr 23, 2021 at 1:07 PM Andrej Shadura <andre...@debian.org> wrote: > > Hi, > > On Fri, 23 Apr 2021, at 11:21, Sergei Golovan wrote: > > On Fri, Apr 23, 2021 at 11:27 AM Andrej Shadura <andre...@debian.org> wrote: > > > While trying to build your package from the source in quite a minimal > > > container, the Build-Conflicts requirement forced the following packages > > > out: > > > > > > > ca-certificates devscripts git-buildpackage libconfig-model-dpkg-perl > > > > liblwp-protocol-https-perl libsoap-lite-perl libwww-perl > > > > libxml-parser-perl > > > > libxml-sax-expat-perl libxmlrpc-lite-perl openssl osc osc-plugin-dput > > > > osc-plugins-dput python3-certifi python3-requests > > > > > > On my normal system, it forces the removal of 358 packages including a > > > huge number of my development tools, the editor and parts of the desktop > > > environment. > > > > > > Please implement what this requirement was supposed to accomplish in a > > > different way not requiring removing openssl. > > > > Currently, tcltls conflicts with openssl because it tries to generate > > DH pair on the fly, > > which sometimes fails due to lack of entropy on buildds. Though it > > looks like the > > newest tcltls allows one to supply option --enable-deterministic and > > get the same result. > > > > I'll fix this bug after the bullseye's release. Thank you for pointing it > > out. > > Thanks. Would you be okay if I went ahead with a team upload with the patch I > attached if the release team grant me an unblock?
No, it wouldn't. The point is that there's no need of any patch. An extra option in debian/rules should be sufficient. I'll try it today and commit the fix to salsa if it'll work. Or if it won't then I'll accept your patch. -- Sergei Golovan