Just for the record, as my example output might be misleading, bandwidth from the hardcopy are improperly computed by the data fetcher. At a later stage of the test suite, I record a dataset which takes a lot more space, and where download rate are more representative of the reality:
0%| | 0/5578 [00:00<?, ? MB/s]
0%| | 2/5578 [00:00<07:13, 12.87 MB/s]
0%| | 4/5578 [00:00<11:14, 8.27 MB/s]
0%| | 6/5578 [00:00<09:19, 9.95 MB/s]
0%| | 9/5578 [00:00<07:03, 13.16 MB/s]
0%| | 12/5578 [00:00<06:05, 15.25 MB/s]
0%| | 16/5578 [00:01<04:57, 18.70 MB/s]
0%| | 21/5578 [00:01<04:00, 23.06 MB/s]
0%| | 27/5578 [00:01<03:18, 28.03 MB/s]
1%| | 34/5578 [00:01<02:45, 33.42 MB/s]
1%| | 42/5578 [00:01<02:21, 39.19 MB/s]
1%| | 50/5578 [00:01<02:07, 43.19 MB/s]
1%| | 58/5578 [00:01<02:00, 45.97 MB/s]
1%| | 66/5578 [00:02<01:55, 47.88 MB/s]
1%|▏ | 74/5578 [00:02<01:51, 49.21 MB/s]
1%|▏ | 81/5578 [00:02<01:53, 48.22 MB/s]
2%|▏ | 89/5578 [00:02<01:50, 49.53 MB/s]
2%|▏ | 97/5578 [00:02<01:48, 50.30 MB/s]
2%|▏ | 105/5578 [00:02<01:47, 50.90 MB/s]
2%|▏ | 113/5578 [00:03<01:46, 51.35 MB/s]
2%|▏ | 121/5578 [00:03<01:45, 51.55 MB/s]
2%|▏ | 129/5578 [00:03<01:45, 51.80 MB/s]
[...]
99%|█████████▉| 5536/5578 [01:47<00:00, 52.38 MB/s]
99%|█████████▉| 5544/5578 [01:47<00:00, 52.41 MB/s]
100%|█████████▉| 5552/5578 [01:47<00:00, 52.39 MB/s]
100%|█████████▉| 5560/5578 [01:47<00:00, 52.37 MB/s]
100%|█████████▉| 5568/5578 [01:47<00:00, 52.37 MB/s]
100%|█████████▉| 5575/5578 [01:47<00:00, 50.57 MB/s]
100%|██████████| 5578/5578 [01:47<00:00, 51.71 MB/s]
0%| | 0/1 [00:00<?, ? MB/s]
100%|██████████| 1/1 [00:00<00:00, 6177.18 MB/s]
0%| | 0/1 [00:00<?, ? MB/s]
100%|██████████| 1/1 [00:00<00:00, 5737.76 MB/s]
dipy.align.tests.test_api.test_syn_registration ... ok
--
Étienne Mollier <etienne.moll...@mailoo.org>
Fingerprint: 8f91 b227 c7d6 f2b1 948c 8236 793c f67e 8f0d 11da
Sent from /dev/pts/8, please excuse my verbosity.
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
