Ritesh Raj Sarraf <r...@debian.org> (2021-05-15):
> Yes. That scsi-modules support bites back now. I just forgot about it
> completely. My intent was to not duplicate another architecture list in
> d/rules, and in trying to simplify things, it has just fallen apart
> with this old oddity of support on armel.

I'm happy to provide (and test) a patch that would only hardcode the
list in debian/control, and make sure the extra steps aren't run from
debian/rules. If you like the idea, you might get a patch in the next
few hours.


Cheers,
-- 
Cyril Brulebois (k...@debian.org)            <https://debamax.com/>
D-I release manager -- Release team member -- Freelance Consultant

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

Reply via email to