On Mon, 21 Jun 2021 16:47:49 -0700 tony mancill <tmanc...@debian.org> wrote: > My apologies if using Breaks in this way is a common pattern. I am > simply not familiar with it. If you have used the pattern before, I > will upgrade the package as-is, since your way is cleaner. Otherwise, I > will remove the Breaks.
Not so much common, "Breaks: + Replaces: + Provides:" pattern is the common case for package replacement. I cannot remember whether I used it before... Please remove Breaks: since ftpmasters would be happy with more simple debdiff :) -- Hideki Yamane <henr...@iijmio-mail.jp>
