On Sat, 2021-06-26 at 20:07 +0200, Michael Biebl wrote: > Then systemd would just setup all groups that are used by systemd > (and > sub-packages).
Seems to be a good change... but it would then still set up *all* users, whether the respective part is used or no. > Personally, I don't think it's worth the effort. > You can try to convince upstream to split up the (monolithic) > systemd.conf this way though. I've asked them to consider this in: https://github.com/systemd/systemd/issues/20044 > If this is not happening upstream, we'd have yet another patch > against > upstream which we never can get rid off again, so I'm not very keen > to > maintain a patch for such a minor issue. I could provide you with a patch, but I kinda see your point that this is some effort just to keep things a bit cleaner. OTOH, less unused stuff => cleaner/more secure Thanks, Chris.
