On Tue, Jul 13, 2021 at 10:13:20PM +0200, Hilmar Preuße wrote: > Am 13.07.2021 um 16:13 teilte Adrian Bunk mit: >... > Hi Adrian,
Hi Hilmar, > > > > > The Makefile has a fallback to netpbm, but this does not work as > > > > > we do not declare a B-D on netpbm. We could simply add it. > > > > > > > > > > What do you think? > > > > > > > > yes, that would be nice. Afaics, Ubuntu disabled that explicitly in > > > > https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/imagemagick/8:6.9.10.23+dfsg-2.1ubuntu3 > > > > > > > Patch tested and committed to github, tag pending. > > > > Please upload, since this is now also a FTBFS in Debian: > > https://tests.reproducible-builds.org/debian/rb-pkg/buster/amd64/texworks-manual.html > > > > See #987504 for background. > > > Will you accept a new upstream snapshot to fix the issue? > > In this case I'd branch from our commit > d85a18296e529ed7ba4af1945fab8c90670835a6 and use that one as starter. It is > just documentation so it should not break other packages. I am not a member of the release team. "It is just documentation" has a point, suggesting d85a1829 plus UNRELEASED -> unstable would sound reasonable to me. You could ask the release team by submitting an unblock request with reportbug release.debian.org containing a diff of debian/ between the version currently in testing and what you'd like to upload. > Hilmar cu Adrian