Control: found -1 2.02+dfsg1-20+deb10u3 Control: found -1 2.04-10 Control: fixed -1 2.04-19 # adding back versions for reopen
Seriously, I reported that the issue exists in sid _too_, just for your convenience, and then you fixed only sid... what is this? If refreshing the patch is so hard to take a time, why not just revert it already? IMO the offending patch itself is not suitable for stable from the very first. I believe "stable" should prefer stable in behavior, not some random additon of seemingly good intention. It is not solving any bug or whatsoever, and introduced an actual bug. Now "stable" is just stale at broken state.
