Holger Wansing wrote:
>>> + If you encounter any issues specifically associated with using
>>> + an alternative init system, there is a Debian init system
>>> + diversity list (<ulink
>>> +
>>> url="debian-init-divers...@chiark.greenend.org.uk">debian-init-divers...@chiark.greenend.org.uk</ulink>)
>>> + who may be able to help.
>>> + </para>
>>> + </section>
>>> </section>
>>
>> I wouldn't call a mailinglist a "who", and I wouldn't introduce a
>> publicly archived list with just the To-address - perhaps make this
>>>
>> an alternative init system, help may be available from the <ulink
>>
>> url="https://www.chiark.greenend.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/debian-init-diversity/";>Debian
>> init system diversity list</ulink>.
> That's not a lists.debian.org mailinglist.
> So, is it ok, to call it a " Debian ... list" ?
In principle all we want to say is that it's a list named
"Debian-init-diversity" (because it's a list *about* Debian stuff).
We've expanded that name slightly by referring to it as the "Debian
init *system* diversity list", but if necessary it could just stick to
an alternative init system, help may be available from <ulink
url="https://www.chiark.greenend.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/debian-init-diversity/";>the
Debian-init-diversity list</ulink>.
--
JBR with qualifications in linguistics, experience as a Debian
sysadmin, and probably no clue about this particular package
