Thanks for the check. It sounds more poppler side. I just read this
email, but are you OK to reassign it to poppler?
Also it might be better to annotate a prefix like "poppler" in the error in
general - though it's a bit of a large change...
2021年9月17日(金) 22:30 Vincent Lefevre <vinc...@vinc17.net>:
> On 2021-09-17 14:40:06 +0200, Vincent Lefevre wrote:
> > The warning comes from xpdf/SplashOutputDev.cc
> >
> > if (xMin - xt < t3Font->glyphX ||
> > yMin - yt < t3Font->glyphY ||
> > xMax - xt > t3Font->glyphX + t3Font->glyphW ||
> > yMax - yt > t3Font->glyphY + t3Font->glyphH) {
> > if (t3Font->validBBox) {
> > error(errSyntaxWarning, -1, "Bad bounding box in Type 3 glyph");
> > }
> > return;
> > }
>
> Actually it doesn't (commenting out this line doesn't change
> anything). Perhaps a bug in poppler, then, as it has similar
> code in poppler/SplashOutputDev.cc:
>
> if (xMin - xt < t3Font->glyphX || yMin - yt < t3Font->glyphY || xMax -
> xt > t3Font->glyphX + t3Font->glyphW || yMax - yt > t3Font->glyphY +
> t3Font->glyphH) {
> if (t3Font->validBBox) {
> error(errSyntaxWarning, -1, "Bad bounding box in Type 3
> glyph");
> }
> return;
> }
>
> --
> Vincent Lefèvre <vinc...@vinc17.net> - Web: <https://www.vinc17.net/>
> 100% accessible validated (X)HTML - Blog: <https://www.vinc17.net/blog/>
> Work: CR INRIA - computer arithmetic / AriC project (LIP, ENS-Lyon)
>
