Hi David, David Kalnischkies wrote: > > I wonder if there is a kind of race condition if aptitude is running > > and then either on the admin on the commandline or a background job > > runs "apt update". > > That can indeed mess up some things as the cache (which is then old) > still points to file locations in the "old" files rather than what an > update might have placed in there in the meantime. […] > > So this package in question is arch:all. > > > > But according to the screenshot, aptitude wants > > texlive-fonts-recommended:amd64 for whatever reason — which indeed > > does not exist. > > This is a misunderstanding. An arch:all deb file is always attributed to > be of the native architecture, in your case amd64. That is because > libapt makes a difference between a package(name with architecture) and > a version (of a package with version number & architecture). […]
Thanks for these explanations and clarifications, much appreciated! Regards, Axel -- ,''`. | Axel Beckert <a...@debian.org>, https://people.debian.org/~abe/ : :' : | Debian Developer, ftp.ch.debian.org Admin `. `' | 4096R: 2517 B724 C5F6 CA99 5329 6E61 2FF9 CD59 6126 16B5 `- | 1024D: F067 EA27 26B9 C3FC 1486 202E C09E 1D89 9593 0EDE