Hi Paul Paul Gevers <elb...@debian.org> writes:
> Hi Nicolas, > > Thanks you, but as I detect these issues in an automatic way without > much manual labor, I don't need the credits :). And I uploaded to > DELAYED exactly to give others the opportunity to fix it before me, so > uploading to DELAYED in my opinion *always* has that ACK implied. > Thank you for providing the opportunity to respond, and ok, as you prefer! :-) > I have pasted the diff below, but for such a no change NMU, I'd just > ignore it if I were you. It's not interesting especially if you beat the > upload anyways. > Agreed. > I can (and will try) to cancel my upload, but it's rather harmless if I > fail because it will indeed be rejected if there is already an newer > version in the suite and you'll only get a reject e-mail about it (which > can still be annoying, so I'll try and cancel). > Ok, thank you for the guidance, and for a positive first "receiving an NMU proposal" experience :-) I'll upload momentarily. For the record, from the package maintainer perspective: good communication on the BTS, integrating the proposed change, and uploading without cancelling the NMU upload is the best social practice? I'd like to keep things positive, you know? Best, Nicholas P.S. I won't be annoyed by the rejection email for -3.1.
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
