Folks, I just want say sorry that I was so grumpy. I am doing this for too long and I am tired. Thanks for not picking fight with me.
I will try to do better, but still having a co-maintainer(s) that would help with the administrivia would help a lot. I can handle most of the technical stuff, but the things beyond are sometimes too much. Ondrej -- Ondřej Surý <ond...@sury.org> (He/Him) > On 26. 11. 2021, at 15:30, David Prévot <da...@tilapin.org> wrote: > > Hi, > > Le 23/11/2021 à 15:57, Paul Gevers a écrit :> On 23-11-2021 11:52, Ondřej > Surý wrote: > […] >> Experimental is the ideal place to find that out. I does require somebody to >> go through the regressions and file bug though, this doesn't happen >> magically. I think David offered help there. > > I’ve checked that all [0] packages with a failing testsuite using PHP 8.1 > from experimental [1] have now a bug (severity important, blocking the > current one) about this issue. > > 0: *except* > - php-horde* packages (Mike and team CCed); > - packages not in testing (shouldn’t be a blocker); > - packages already fixed (come on, refresh! ;). > > 1: > https://release.debian.org/britney/pseudo-excuses-experimental.html#php-defaults > > For Horde packages, Paul already noticed many errors are “just” PHP > deprecations, so using “Restrictions: allow-stderr” in d/t/control should at > least allow to go one step further, even if we’re just hiding issues under > the carpet for now. > >>> And I would prefer if we roughly agree on a timeframe when we start >>> the transition to php8.2 - I can upload the 8.2.0~beta1 as soon as it >>> is ready upstream, so the ftp-masters have time, and keep uploading >>> rcN versions (this will usually take few months) and start the >>> transition right away when 8.2.0 is golden (December 2022). Would >>> that work? > > (keeping that part to inform Horde maintainers in the mean time). > > Regards > > David