Control: tag -1 - wontfix > Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity. On Tue, Nov 23, 2021 at 06:21:14AM +0530, Pirate Praveen wrote: > > > 2021, നവംബർ 22 11:12:36 PM IST, Antonio Terceiro <terce...@debian.org>ൽ എഴുതി > >Control: tag -1 + wontfix > > > >On Sun, Nov 21, 2021 at 11:51:22PM +0530, Pirate Praveen wrote: > >> Package: gem2deb > >> Version: 1.7 > >> Severity: wishlist > >> > >> should we really honor <= constraint in gemspecs? in ruby-google-fog > >> upstream wants fog-core <= 2.1.0 it will never be satisfied in debian > >> > >> because 2.1.0-1 >= 2.1.0 and we have 2.1.0-3.1 in archive > >> > >> we could either ignore or may be detect the current version in the archive > >> (it will require a rebuild if dependency change) > > > >In cases like this, IMO the gemspec needs to be patched to drop such > >dependency. Even if we did ignore it and didn't represent that with a > >corresponding << constraint in debian/control, the dependency check will > >still fail during the build unless the gemspec is patched. > > In this specific case the build did not fail, only installation during > autopkgtest that failed because of control file. > > fog-core version in its gemspec is 2.1.0 and it satisfies. > > This is to take care of debian revision only, for new upstream versions, we > still have to patch if update needed.
Yes, now I understand what is the issue. I think we could fix that by translating <= x.y to <= x.y-9999 ? <= is not handled in any special way at the moment.
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
