Hi, Sylvestre Ledru (2021-12-01): > As part of the effort to limit the number of llvm packages in the > archive, it would be great if you could upgrade to -13 (or -12). > > Bookworm won't ship with llvm-toolchain-11 > > llvm-defaults is now pointing to -13.
I understand a binNMU would be sufficient to fix this problem (that will become RC during the Bookworm dev cycle). But perhaps we could instead remove this package from testing/sid: - low popcon - leaf package - Last activity by the upstream maintainer on the GitHub project seems to be from 6 years ago. And indeed, 6 years ago, upstream wrote "I'm not really using the project myself" (https://bugs.debian.org/803645#60). Thoughts? Lucas, I see you ITP'ed this package and introduced it in the archive, so perhaps you're aware of good reasons to keep it around? Cheers!