Hi Lance, thanks a lot for your attempt to help!
Am Wed, Dec 15, 2021 at 02:10:39PM +0000 schrieb Lance Lin: > While looking for bugs to fix, I noticed you opened wishlist bugs related to > autopkgtest suites for a few debian med packages (also #986200, #986194, > #986193). Etienne Mollier also has similar wishlist items (#983237, #994575). > > Since these are all autopkgtest efforts, I thought I would work on them > together. That would be great. > Some of the packages have example test cases while others do not. As an > example with fsm-lite, it has no built in tests. I was thinking of using a > small sample .fasta file > (http://prodata.swmed.edu/promals/info/fasta_format_file_example.htm) to > produce known output. I would then use that known output as the "control" for > autopkgtest validation. Do you agree with this approach? This sounds very sensible. I'd recommend to use our autopkgtest boilerplate which you can find in our package_template: https://salsa.debian.org/med-team/community/package_template/-/tree/master/debian/tests Hope this helps and please do not hesitate to keep on asking here or on the mailing list debian-...@lists.debian.org in case you might face any trouble Andreas. -- http://fam-tille.de
