On 2022-01-18 19:25:08 +0100, Sébastien Villemot wrote: > Le mardi 18 janvier 2022 à 19:18 +0100, Sebastian Ramacher a écrit : > > On 2022-01-18 09:11:01 +0100, Sébastien Villemot wrote: > > > Le lundi 17 janvier 2022 à 11:03 +0100, Sébastien Villemot a écrit : > > > > Le dimanche 16 janvier 2022 à 21:11 +0100, Sebastian Ramacher a écrit : > > > > > On 2022-01-12 13:46:03 +0100, Sébastien Villemot wrote: > > > > > > Package: release.debian.org > > > > > > Severity: normal > > > > > > User: release.debian....@packages.debian.org > > > > > > Usertags: transition > > > > > > X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-oct...@lists.debian.org > > > > > > > > > > > > Please schedule a transition for octave 6.4, which is currently in > > > > > > experimental. All Octave add-ons need to be recompiled, because of > > > > > > a change in > > > > > > the interface exposed to them. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Please go ahead > > > > > > > > Thanks. octave 6.4.0-2 has been uploaded to unstable, and compiled on > > > > all release architectures. > > > > > > The recompilation process is almost completed. The only remaining > > > problem is octave-tisean which fails to rebuild on s390x (see #874116, > > > which is a long-standing issue). > > > > > > octave-tisean is a leaf package, so I suggest to remove it from > > > testing, so that we can complete the transition. > > > > Removal hint added. > > > > Note that octave-database's autopkgtest on armhf regressed. See > > https://ci.debian.net/data/autopkgtest/testing/armhf/o/octave-database/18432401/log.gz > > for the log > > I’ve tried to reproduce the failure on abel.d.o, but the autopkgtest > succeeded. I have no clue about the problem. If this is an option for > you, then I would simply force the migration despite the bad test.
Bug filed (#1004158) and hint added. Cheers > > -- > ⢀⣴⠾⠻⢶⣦⠀ Sébastien Villemot > ⣾⠁⢠⠒⠀⣿⡁ Debian Developer > ⢿⡄⠘⠷⠚⠋⠀ https://sebastien.villemot.name > ⠈⠳⣄⠀⠀⠀⠀ https://www.debian.org > -- Sebastian Ramacher
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
