On 2022-01-16 Andreas Metzler <ametz...@bebt.de> wrote: [...] > I will probably followup with further wishes/comments later, not today > but hopefully in next week. [...]
Hello Thomas, I think there are just two thing left pre upload: 1. The upload introduces an epoch because the upstream version went from yyyymmdd to 2.0.yyyymmdd. Given that the new version scheme seems to have found acceptance in e.g. Fedora /I/ do not see a better way. Could you ask about the epoch on debian-devel (as per policy https://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/ch-controlfields.html#epochs-should-be-used-sparingly ) - TIA. 2. It would be nice to merge the changelog entries for 1:2.0.20220109-1 and 1:2.0.20220114-1, listing only the changes relative to what was yet uploaded to Debian. (I would not consider this a must for sponsorship.) cu Andreas -- `What a good friend you are to him, Dr. Maturin. His other friends are so grateful to you.' `I sew his ears on from time to time, sure'