Hi, * Sean Whitton <spwhit...@spwhitton.name> [220125 00:06]: > On Mon 24 Jan 2022 at 11:33AM +01, Chris Hofstaedtler wrote: > > > For context, the idea is that /usr/bin/rename should become > > src:util-linux' rename implementation. > > That seems likely to break a great many scripts, though? > > Perhaps we should ship them both under a name other than > /usr/bin/rename, such that people are prompted to update their scripts > to choose one, or create their own symlink?
Then all of this is a completely pointless exercise. Either we break them, or it is favorable to keeping the way things are: A very valid way of closing this discussion is saying "our (Perl) /usr/bin/rename is great, people should use that". Chris
