Le dimanche 26 décembre 2021 à 16:03:41+0000, Mathias Gibbens a écrit :
> On Sun, 26 Dec 2021 12:33:43 -0300 Antonio Terceiro
> <terce...@debian.org> wrote:
> > On Sat, Dec 25, 2021 at 02:25:06PM +0000, Evgeni Golov wrote:
> > > On December 25, 2021 12:35:45 PM UTC, Antonio Terceiro
> <terce...@debian.org> wrote:
> > > >They probably would need to be provided by a (NEW) lxc-common
> package.
> > > >If we ever need to transition to liblxc2, we don't want both
> liblxc*
> > > >packages providing those files.
> > > 
> > > On Ubuntu, this package us called liblxc-common, which we probably
> > > should also use, to make life of other consumers easier?
> > 
> > Sure! I didn't check there first.
> 
>   I think a liblxc-common package should work just fine. I haven't
> found any other files in the lxc package that LXD is expecting to have
> around, but if I do I'll update this bug.
> 
>   I'm happy to help test any changes to the packaging when they're
> ready.
> 
> Thanks!

I've made some changes I've decided to upload on salsa and on
experimental.

If you're able to test these changes on some clean environment, I'd be
happy if you could do it as I like the time to redo a clean testing
environment for lxc right now.

If you can't, I'll try to do it this weekend or during the next week.

-- 
Pierre-Elliott Bécue
GPG: 9AE0 4D98 6400 E3B6 7528  F493 0D44 2664 1949 74E2
It's far easier to fight for principles than to live up to them.

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

Reply via email to