Hi Michael, Bug 100908 is a duplicate of 982436. 982436 suggested the 99 instead of 10. I think the logic here is originally these settings were in /etc/sysctl.conf and that's the last loaded file, so a 99 prefix puts it "lastish".
- Craig On Mon, 24 Jan 2022 at 21:00, Michael Schaller <mi...@google.com> wrote: > Note that the new file name is `99-protect-links.conf` but the bug > filer asked for `10-protect-links.conf`. > > Was that `99` intentional? >
