On Xan 20 2022, Anton Khirnov wrote: > Attaching a patch. I still couldn't think of a reason this code should > ever disable IPv6 on the physical interface, so it's removed > unconditionally. If anyone can think of such a reason, then I guess an > option could be added?
Well, the thing here is that since de beginning of the bridge code it was recommended not to add ip addresses to the bridge ports, this was a long time ago, and maybe it has changed, if so, I'd like to know when. But anyway... why would you want to have an IP v4 or v6 on the bridge ports? why not having it on the bridge itself? Regards. -- Manty/BestiaTester -> http://manty.net
