Dear Arm Porters

Is anyone able to help with the bus error on armhf please?


On Wed, 16 Feb 2022 at 09:33, Andreas Tille <andr...@an3as.eu> wrote:
>
> Control: tags -1 upstream
> Control: forwarded -1 
> https://github.com/scikit-learn/scikit-learn/issues/22503
>          also sent another bug report 
> https://github.com/scikit-learn/scikit-learn/issues/22504
>
> Hi,
>
> as I explained to Debian Science list[1] I'd recommend to drop armel and
> armhf architectures.  I checked the build logs and noticed that these
> architectures are failing with "Bus error".  While I subscribe to the
> reasoning that this could be caused by some coding bug which hides
> somewhere and is not detected on other architectures I think we should
> draw some line here.  Obviously we do not have the power to maintain
> this code for all architectures neither do I expect that there is any
> honest user of this code on the said architectures.  So I would simply
> exclude these from the list of architectures.
>
> For the other architectures I opened two different issues upstream:
>
>   Test suite failure for arm64, ppc64el, s390x, ppc64 and risc64[2]
>
> and
>
>   Second build failure for s390x and ppc64[3]
>
> Kind regards
>
>       Andreas.
>
> PS: Volunteers to sort out the Bus error on the 32 bit arm architectures
>     are welcome.
>
> [1] https://lists.debian.org/debian-science/2022/02/msg00029.html
> [2] https://github.com/scikit-learn/scikit-learn/issues/22503
> [3] https://github.com/scikit-learn/scikit-learn/issues/22504
>
> --
> http://fam-tille.de

Reply via email to