On Sat, Mar 19, 2022 at 12:47:50AM +0000, Simon McVittie wrote: > On Fri, 18 Mar 2022 at 17:38:43 +0100, László Böszörményi (GCS) wrote: > > At this point I remember only two packages that FTBFS > > with ICU 70.1 and I couldn't fix those. One is mozjs78 and the other > > is 0ad. > > mozjs78 has unit tests that assume the vendored ICU will be used. I'm > trying to adapt them so they'll accept the results given by either 67.1 > or 70.1. >...
Is this worth the effort? Given that cjs will hopefully move away from mozjs78 in bookworm so that mozjs78 won't be in bookworm, it might be easiest to just make mozjs78 use the internal ICU. > smcv cu Adrian
