Francesco Paolo Lovergine <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> On Tue, May 02, 2006 at 11:33:26AM +0200, Frank K??ster wrote:
>> > Uhm, if a would follow correcly the dev package split, I should remove
>> > completely the xlibs-dev depending, leaving it among requirements of
>> > its dependable packages. Each package should add its own -dev package
>> > list. Unfortunately this would break
>> > build-deps in a few packages, so I think this will be a post-sarge 
>> > change.
>> 
>> post-sarge is now, we're already approaching pre-etch, so this should be
>> fixed real soon now, I guess.
>> 
>> Regards, Frank
>
> Yep, I guess this will break by FTBS a few packages... 

You could also drop libxaw8-dev as a dependeny alternative.  I'm sure I
read an announcement somewhere that it's going to be dropped, but I
can't find it at the moment.

Regards, Frank
-- 
Frank Küster
Single Molecule Spectroscopy, Protein Folding @ Inst. f. Biochemie, Univ. Zürich
Debian Developer (teTeX)


Reply via email to