Hi Andreas,

On Sat, 5 Feb 2022 13:45:25 +0100 Andreas Beckmann <a...@debian.org> wrote:
On 03/02/2022 18.46, Andreas Beckmann wrote:
> In order to build intel-graphics-compiler against llvm-11 we would need > to reintroduce spirv-llvm-translator and intel-opencl-clang built > against llvm-11. These are tightly coupled to the llvm version being > used and will change the soname accordingly. I would therefore > reintroduce them as new source packages with '-11' appended.
> Would adding two more source packages depending on llvm-11 be OK?
> That's the only solution I see for making intel-compute-runtime > buildable again on a short time frame.

I've now managed to do the same with llvm-12, so I'd rather introduce src:spirv-llvm-translator-12 and src:opencl-clang-12 and leave llvm-11 alone ;-)

As a Release Team member, I rather have llvm-11 based than llvm-12 base. intel-graphics-compiler is the only package why llvm-12 is still in testing.

PS: Looking ahead into the future: If llvm continues to do two major releases per year (Mar/Apr, Sept/Oct), which llvm versions are likely available at the time we freeze bookworm (guessing early 2023, so llvm-15 should be out) and which llvm versions (and which default) would you like to release with bookworm?

We have llvm-14 now indeed. For the plan, we need Sylvestre.

Paul

Attachment: OpenPGP_signature
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Reply via email to